P2P Lending – Prospect For the Crunched Buyer?
photo credit: AmandaLouise
With banks constricting their lending opportunities for borrowers these past months, The New York Post’s video about the benefits of person-to-person lending is a short but incisive analysis of the credit program. The concept is simple: financial intermediaries are eliminated but the firm manages to match borrowers and lenders together minus the additional cost charged by banks in traditional lending schemes. The online transaction allows a borrower to seek lower interest rates, bypassing the services of a bank while in the comforts of their home.
However, the rates won’t keep getting lower. Lenders naturally have to base their interest rates with that of the central bank’s and other zero-risk investment opportunities’. After all, alternatives for newer lending practices such as P2P are always available and can be substituted at a more secured return from the government.
Prosper.comhas gained popularity with its low-fee, no prepayment penalty, and fixed-interest rate proposal. Borrowers set the maximum interest rate and lenders bid on the best rate that they can offer in return. The lowest bid wins and the borrower then receives the loan directly to his bank account. Other online lending firms like Lending Club and Loanio have their separate marketing schemes as well.
Why Choose P2P?
Borrowers strapped of needed cash can avail of loans with lower interest rates. This makes it ideal for those needing urgent financing. In fact, some institutions may offer collateral-free programs provided that potential borrowers meet certain criteria in their credit standing.
Most programs also offer fixed interest rate loans that can secure borrowers against fluctuating rates in the market. Other fees also remain low primarily because firms save from expenses on office infrastructure and funding costs.
The Drawbacks
Zopa.com in the United Kingdom is not regulated by the government but by a different agency according to one a study . Regulation in the United States has to be firmly laid out yet to assure lender confidence in their P2P transactions since this type of lending only began in 2005.
Risk assessment is still another issue that most of them have difficulty perfecting. While borrowers can be referred by friends, colleagues and former borrowers in the lending institutions, the lack of more effective credit investigation measures possessed by universal banks is another setback in their screening methods. This view is however opposed by The Economist in its issue a year ago. They see this weakness in asset-backed commercial papers issued by banks instead.
Lastly, the rate of return is not always guaranteed as many borrowers have defaulted and eventually brought down an entire company. Lenders and borrowers need to verify the fines against late payments and defaults so they can be aware of lender protection in a specific firm.
Into the Crisis
P2P Lending aims to benefit both borrower and lender. In fact, those who have lower FICO scores but manage to obtain credit in select P2P firms can improve their credit scores eventually. Now that banks have pulled their lending reins, borrowers can seek refuge to this alternative lending offer. It is sensible however to keep in mind that greed played a large factor in the excessive loan sales that spawned the crisis that we are currently experiencing. As such, proper regulation and oversight in the activities of these firms must be set uniformly much as banks do get constant monitoring as they improve risk profiling and transparency among the borrowers.
Andy Denton of http://www.Realty.com
